Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit
Letter: Stop workplace bullying
topical

Letter: Stop workplace bullying

{{featured_button_text}}

The week of Oct. 18-24 is Freedom from Workplace Bullying Week. Sponsored by the Workplace Bullying Institute, it describes bullying as "non-physical workplace violence. It is abusive, causing psychological injuries and stress-related diseases." Bullying, like domestic abuse, is all about power and control. Workplace bullying is more common than most people realize.

I experienced workplace bullying when I was city clerk for Rock Island and endured humiliating and intimidating behavior, work interference and sabotage, and verbal abuse against me. I reported the bullying at least 53 times to the human resources director, the city manager, and the mayor while it was happening, all to no avail. Aldermen tried to intervene without success. I retired when I realized that city management was never going to do anything about the abuse.

With workplace bullying, management usually sides with the bully; bullies often engage others in the campaign against the target, and management typically fires the target of the bully or makes it impossible for the target to stay.

The Workplace Bullying Institute makes these recommendations to those being targeted by bullies: "Break the silence! Tell co-workers, friends, and family. Put your health first. Schedule a coaching appointment. Talk to an attorney. Do not believe the BIG LIE about you. Reclaim your dignity — fight back or find a new job."

You’re not alone if you’ve experienced workplace bullying. Only by speaking out against this abuse is there hope that someday there will be zero tolerance for workplace bullying.

For more information, visit workplacebullying.org.

Judith Gilbert

Rock Island

1
1
0
0
0

Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

  • Updated

The White House recently threw Gov. Kim Reynolds under the bus regarding Iowa's response to COVID-19. She was criticized for her policies contributing to needless deaths, and skyrocketing positivity rates, some of the highest in the nation. So much for putting faith in Iowans making the right decisions. Who is really calling the shots in Iowa?

The Quad-City Times' endorsement of Rep. Cheri Bustos states, "We are disappointed that, when we spoke with her, Bustos was somewhat evasive when confronted with certain issues." Bustos, you say, talked of support for an "ambitious" climate change plan but "we got little idea, despite our probing, what that might mean."

I doubt I am the only one who is exhausted by the financial and political corruption of the current Republican Party. As the saying goes, I’m sick and tired of being sick and tired. Given what they did to block Merrick Garland’s nomination four years ago, the current Supreme Court nomination process in Washington is so cynical that Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham aren’t even trying to cover up their hypocrisy.

Donald Trump’s most often repeated claim in his reelection campaign is that he’s been a great job creator. To hear him talk, you’d think that job creation skyrocketed after he became president.

The Illinois ballot this year contains a proposition for Rock Island County that reads, "Should the Illinois General Assembly protect a citizen's right to keep and bear arms as defined by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution?"

The best measure of human misery caused by the pandemic is the ratio of deaths to population. If we had the same ratio as Germany, we would have about 41,000 deaths; France, 167,000; if measured against Canada, it would be 87,000. Instead, we have over 225,000 and rising.

Synonyms for fair are impartial and equitable. The proposed “fair” tax is neither of those things, nor is it fair. The only fair tax is that everyone pays the exact same percentage, which is what is in the Illinois Constitution presently.

When The Dispatch-Argus, or any newspaper for that matter, endorses a candidate for president, is it the owner of the paper, one member of the editorial board, or all of them? In any case, who cares who four or five people like? Is their endorsement supposed to sway undecided voters or change the minds of those already committed to a particular candidate?

For many Americans the catastrophic mishandling of the novel coronavirus pandemic is the pivotal issue in the upcoming election. Not surprising. Today, the nation finds itself grieving a staggering loss of life and needless suffering as well as the dire economic consequences created by a policy based on "let’s pretend" politics.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.

Topics

News Alerts

Breaking News