Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Letter: Imagine

Letter: Imagine


Imagine a persona, man or woman, any color, any creed. They are smart, courageous, strong. They grow into great success, creating a reputation of integrity, hard work, valor, generosity. But behind the scenes, they are sometimes cruel and unsavory. They continue stronger with age, a leader for individual freedom and the pursuit of happiness; yet also more deft at manipulation, successfully weaving deceptions, remaining rooted in ruthless ways. Eventually, they are called out on their checkered past. They make excuses, some new promises, some old promises; but the methods don't change. So the accusations become even more vehement, and this persona is vilified for problems of the past, present and even for future fears.

Finally, it all comes to a head. There are two choices. Double down on the old methods to increase their ruthlessness and destroy the opposition, so that they could claim to be "Great Again".

Or, admit the past. All of it. Own it. Destroy the old methodology and move ahead with real change, true generosity, and sincere intentions to live up to the noble facade that has begun to fade. It is feared that this second option might cause transitional social and economic pain, and diminish their financial security, power, and influence. However, this choice would make them exactly what the world had been promised, a person of honesty, sincerity, justice and charity.

What would you prefer this person choose for the rest of their life?

What do you choose for the future of this country?

Now. Vote.

Steve Taghon

East Moline


Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

The Illinois ballot this year contains a proposition for Rock Island County that reads, "Should the Illinois General Assembly protect a citizen's right to keep and bear arms as defined by the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution?"

The White House recently threw Gov. Kim Reynolds under the bus regarding Iowa's response to COVID-19. She was criticized for her policies contributing to needless deaths, and skyrocketing positivity rates, some of the highest in the nation. So much for putting faith in Iowans making the right decisions. Who is really calling the shots in Iowa?

The Quad-City Times' endorsement of Rep. Cheri Bustos states, "We are disappointed that, when we spoke with her, Bustos was somewhat evasive when confronted with certain issues." Bustos, you say, talked of support for an "ambitious" climate change plan but "we got little idea, despite our probing, what that might mean."

Donald Trump’s most often repeated claim in his reelection campaign is that he’s been a great job creator. To hear him talk, you’d think that job creation skyrocketed after he became president.

When The Dispatch-Argus, or any newspaper for that matter, endorses a candidate for president, is it the owner of the paper, one member of the editorial board, or all of them? In any case, who cares who four or five people like? Is their endorsement supposed to sway undecided voters or change the minds of those already committed to a particular candidate?

Synonyms for fair are impartial and equitable. The proposed “fair” tax is neither of those things, nor is it fair. The only fair tax is that everyone pays the exact same percentage, which is what is in the Illinois Constitution presently.

For many Americans the catastrophic mishandling of the novel coronavirus pandemic is the pivotal issue in the upcoming election. Not surprising. Today, the nation finds itself grieving a staggering loss of life and needless suffering as well as the dire economic consequences created by a policy based on "let’s pretend" politics.

Funny. There's been a lot of legislative activity in Iowa which implies that females are either too stupid or too immoral to make a medical decision that does not spread a contagious disease. It's funny because, when it comes to actions that do spread a contagious disease, somehow it's all freedom of choice. Hmmm.

The week of Oct. 18-24 is Freedom from Workplace Bullying Week. Sponsored by the Workplace Bullying Institute, it describes bullying as "non-physical workplace violence. It is abusive, causing psychological injuries and stress-related diseases." Bullying, like domestic abuse, is all about power and control. Workplace bullying is more common than most people realize.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News