Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Letter: Don't create resentment

Letter: Don't create resentment


I am writing to voice concerns about treating the 1619 Project as "history." It is based on the premise that American prosperity was built on the back of slavery. The historical record states differently.

Early in the formation of the United States, slavery was rejected by the northern states. For decades, Congress tried to maintain a delicate balance between free and slave states. The balance was so tight that a free state could not come into the union without a slave state. This is evidenced by the Missouri Compromise of 1820 and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Mason-Dixon line divided these two ideologies. Bloody Kansas and John Brown’s attack on Harpers Ferry unraveled the political balancing act.

What has this to do with the 1619 Project? By the start of the American Civil War the free North held overwhelming advantages in population, industrial capacity and railroads. Investment and immigration favored the North because there, opportunity was to be found. The North used these advantages to march into the South and crush the Confederacy. With this advantage the North invaded the South with an edge in warships, cannon, logistics, troops, and the ability to move them. Had slavery been the foundation of American prosperity, these conditions would have been reversed.

We can enhance the history of Americans of color without fabrication. There are great heroes from before the Revolution to our astronaut corps today. Let’s add examples that we should all look up to rather than creating resentment and division.

Bill Bloom



Catch the latest in Opinion

* I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.

Related to this story

Most Popular

Iowa had record voter turnout in last year's presidential election. A record 1.7 million voted, representing nearly 76% turnout, with no major allegations of fraud. Yes, there was significant emotion involved with this election and the COVID-19 pandemic was raging throughout the country. As a result, a number of states, including Iowa, took extraordinary steps to ensure that voters had an opportunity to vote safely without putting themselves and poll workers at risk of exposure to COVID or long lines at polling places.

In June 2020, the Wall Street Journal published an op-ed by Vice President Mike Pence about the Trump administration’s handling of the coronavirus pandemic. Pence wrote, "We are winning the fight against the invisible enemy," despite factual evidence to the contrary. In a letter to the publisher of the newspaper, 280 newsroom staffers at the Journal criticized "Opinion’s lack of fact-checking and transparency, and its apparent disregard for evidence,” citing Pence’s op-ed, among others.

Removing the Western Illinois University-Quad-City campus would be disastrous for our region. As a current senior, the WIU-QC campus is the only way I'm able to earn a bachelor's degree, affordably, at home. Driving to the WIU-Macomb campus for class, while working in Moline, would be impossible and simply not a feasible option — nor is attending a private institution due to tuition costs.

I am adding my voice to the need for the district-wide recount of Iowa’s 2nd Congressional District. This recount is essential not just for Rita Hart, not just for Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks, but for each person in Iowa. This recount is about our basic right to have our vote counted in every election in which we participate.

Doubt about the result fuels the appeal by Clinton County’s Rita Hart concerning her race for the U.S. House of Representatives. She would accept the voters choosing someone else but not leaving legal votes uncounted. Iowans of the 2nd Congressional District have the right to decide who will represent them in Congress, and they have decided. But we don’t know whether they picked Hart or Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Ottumwa. There are 22 legal but uncounted ballots, even though Miller-Meeks has been provisionally seated.

Sangeetha Rayapati is the best choice for Moline mayor. Her passion for our community shines through in everything that she does. I had the privilege of witnessing her campaign for Moline school board and subsequent service as vice president and then president of the school board. Before that, I knew her to be, and know her still to be, an engaging, inspiring, and dedicated educator. Her service in all of these roles and her natural capacity as a leader, combined with her vision for our community, make her the unquestionable choice for my vote on April 6. I urge you to join me in supporting Sangeetha Rayapati.

Get up-to-the-minute news sent straight to your device.


News Alerts

Breaking News