Fix historical lapse in an otherwise brilliant Lincoln


Share
Posted Online: Feb. 19, 2013, 6:00 am
Comment on this story | Print this story | Email this story
Los Angeles Times
Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln" has been acclaimed not just by critics but by historians as well for its acute and realistic portrayal of the 16th president as he maneuvered to pass the 13th Amendment, which abolished slavery in the United States.

But the filmmakers got at least one detail wrong: They depicted two Connecticut delegates to the House of Representatives voting against the amendment when, in fact, all four of Connecticut's House members voted for it in 1865. Now, one of the state's current representatives, Joe Courtney, a Democrat, has written to Spielberg asking if the movie could be corrected before it's released on DVD.

In a statement, screenwriter Tony Kushner admitted that he deliberately strayed from fact when he put "nay" votes in the mouths of the two Connecticut congressmen" but only to emphasize the dramatic closeness of the vote. He also made up fictitious names for the two lawmakers so he wouldn't be in the position of showing real people doing something they never did.

Unfortunately, changing the names didn't really solve the problem. The offending scene may have been only 15 seconds in a 2 1/2-hour movie, as Kushner noted, but those few moments were a part of one of the great moral battles of all time. It's understandable that the people of Connecticut wouldn't want to be put unfairly on the wrong side of history.

Of course, "Lincoln" is not a documentary. It's historical fiction. Spielberg and Kushner were within their rights to take what artistic license they felt was needed, and they did: Dialogue has been created; encounters have been imagined. Nevertheless, the challenge of good historical fiction is to tell a compelling story in the context of history. In the last year, several movies have been criticized for inaccuracies.

While "Argo" was based on a now-declassified CIA mission to rescue hostages in Iran, neither viewers nor the filmmakers mistook it for a history lesson. On the other hand, "Zero Dark Thirty," which opens with a claim that it's based on firsthand accounts, was assailed for portraying torture as more helpful than it actually was in the search for Osama bin Laden.

"Zero Dark Thirty" director Kathryn Bigelow argues that the truth about the hunt for bin Laden is still being debated. But that's' not the case with the 13th Amendment. The Connecticut vote may not have been the most significant historical fact of the Lincoln era, but it's one of the more easily documented.
For otherwise meticulous filmmakers to change it so cavalierly was a disappointing lapse in judgment. They're the artists; they can do what they want. But we're sorry about that one small choice.















 



Local events heading








  Today is Friday, July 25, the 206th day of 2014. There are 159 days left in the year.

1864 -- 150 years ago: Walter Jones, of Co, F 23rd Ky, volunteers, lost a satchel on the Camden road, yesterday, containing his papers of discharge from the army.
1889 -- 125 years ago: E. W. Robinson purchased from Mrs. J.T. Miller the livery stable on the triangle south of Market square.
1914 -- 100 years ago: A municipal; bathing beach was advocated at the weekly meeting of the city commission by commissioner Rudgren, who suggested the foot of Seventh Street as an excellent location.
1939 -- 75 years ago: Floyd Shetter, Rock Island county superintendent schools, announced teachers hired for nearly all of the 95 rural and village grade schools in the county.
1964 -- 50 years ago: The mercury officially reached the season's previous high of 95 about noon today and continued upward toward an expected mark of 97.
1989 -- 25 years ago: Fort Armstrong hotel once the wining and dining chambers of Rock Island's elite is under repair. Progress is being made though at a seeming snail's pace to return the building to a semblance of its past glory for senior citizen's homes.








(More History)